Showing posts with label apostles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apostles. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

How does one follow Jesus?

Look, a cute baby:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Now for the lesson (you can look at babies when you are done, I promise):
 
How does one follow Jesus? There are many ways, many perfect ways in which one can live their life as a follower of Jesus. Catholics have a good number of orders such as Franciscans, Dominicans, and others. These are disciplined and orderly successions of priests and laity following in the footsteps of their founders. One thing on common with all of these is discipleship.

In the Gospel of Mark there is a clear message of discipleship as Jesus recruits the Apostles. What we see when Jesus offers the Apostles the opportunity to follow Him is the perfect way in which one responds to the call of Jesus to discipleship.

As Jesus approaches and seeks out the first, being Simon and Andrew (1:16-18), James and John (1:19-20), we notice four distinct interactions: Jesus passing by, Jesus offering with “follow me”, the new disciples immediately responding leaving their nets, and following. The seeking, the offering, the leaving, and the following; four elements for discipleship in Christ. Notice Jesus, the Son of God seeking out individuals for His own discipleship. The same man that said if he is lifted up he will draw the whole world to Himself, sets out in the region to find the Apostles. They refer to Him as their rabbi. The usual rabbi would sit, Jesus would stand. The usual custom is for disciples to stand and listen, while the disciples of Jesus sat and asked questions if necessary. Perhaps this is one contributing reason to people thinking of Jesus approach as “a new teaching” or “one who teaching with His own authority.” Certainly following Jesus is not like following other teachers.

So the disciples respond in perfection: they immediately leave everything behind. But their leaving is not meaningless and Mark is gracious enough to supplement this for us. They leave for the purpose of following. Leaving with a purpose, following with faith. There is an Old Testament parallel to this scene. In 1 Kings 19 we see Elijah passing Elisha by, and offering discipleship in the manner of “throwing his mantle over him.” Elisha responds by catching up to Elijah (probably a little surprised by the gesture) and informing the prophet that he will say goodbye to his family and then will come and follow. Acceptable? I think so.  I mean, Jesus tells us to “count the cost” before following. Faith moves and if it moves fast, fine. If it moves with carefulness, fine. There is only one Peter, and he even needed some proof when His brother told him he believed he had found the messiah.

G.K. Chesterton says “no one comes to conversion at the same angle”. Mark the Evangelist is not recording this account like a journalist by leaving out some teaching or agenda. Instead he gives two accounts (1:16-18, 1:19-20) with the same pattern as if to say “look, this is the right way to do it!” Response to Jesus is a daily task in the truest meaning – and it can be one to be taken with some consideration – but the perfect disciple stands firm, saying “your will be done” or in the words of the Mother of God, “let it be done to me according to your will.”

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Apostles and Nicene Creeds Part 5 : The Holy Spirit

Hey everyone. Thanks for visiting. I hope someone somewhere is learning something here – I know I am.

Apostles: “I believe in the Holy Spirit.”


Nicene: “We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son. With the Father and the Son he is worshipped and glorified. He has spoken through the Prophets.”

      I cannot say enough about how important it is to understand the creeds. They have context, historical placement, and character that reflect the development of our faith. One of these days I will have to write a bit about that – the development of the Christian Faith. I have been mentioning it to you in the Creeds series if you have been following, but none is so evident as these passages from either creed.

       Any lay person can see there is a huge difference in the two. What does this suggest? Does it mean the people who wrote and recited the Apostles creed didn’t believe the Spirit proceeds from the Father? Why did they stop so soon in the confession of faith? One thing most might not think of is that statements of faith are not typically defined until they are challenged. It is not that the Bishops of the early fourth century made up the teaching or that Sts. Peter and Paul did not agree or understand the later profession (the Nicene). Rather, the Church developed an understanding about their beliefs and received better clarification after years of challenging heretics.

       This part of the creed is a continuation of the entire aim of the creeds themselves, which is our statement about our God as has been revealed to us. Will anyone argue that God has revealed himself to mankind over many occasions and periods of time? I doubt a reasonable person would. Then this part of the creed is no different. We find a pattern in the creed at this point that the person of deity is named and then reference is further clarified as to single that person out and then show a relationship. In the beginning we read “I believe in God, the Father… maker…” then read “and in Jesus Christ, His only Son,” and start to conclude with “We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord… who has spoken through the Prophets.” We observe that we don’t just believe in any old God, or any old Holy Spirit; we come 200 years later in the Nicene Creed to explain precisely who and what we are talking about. We do so with the Holy Spirit by first defining who the Father is, and then the Son, so that when we state “who proceeds from the Father and the Son” we know clearly who we refer to – there is no mistake – it is a definitization of our faith – a Dogma.     

       This understanding of Dogmatic Theology is incredibly important, and unfortunately unpopular among Catholicism’s critics. The opposing believer will argue that all Truth is only found in the Bible. We call this infallibility, or Sola Scriptura, that the Bible is the one rule of faith for a Christian and contains all the teaching necessary for salvation. A discussion will be held another day to persuade this otherwise in a charitable fashion. One cannot argue though the revelation God has given over the Holy Spirit. Would one in the time of King David have said that the Holy Spirit is of the same deity as God? No. Would one have said in the time before the Prophets that the Holy Spirit spoke though them? No. Would one who walked next to Jesus have been able to understand the fruits, gifts, and inspirations of the Holy Spirit? No.

       In the OT, the Holy Spirit was selectively poured out on Kings, Patriarchs, and then Prophets as a means of guidance. We believe now, that that very same Holy Spirit guides a willing Christian. Jesus said in reference to this in John 14:14, that the Holy Spirit would come and teach everything, and remind them of everything Jesus had said.

       The Holy Spirit is also the “giver of life.” Adam inhaled this from God in order to breath – before the fall. Jesus breathed the same on the Apostles in John 20:20 “He breathed on them and said “receive the Holy Spirit.”” This is the real life giver and so it makes its appearance in the Nicene Creed. In ancient times, the breath in ones body was a sign of life. According to Jesus, one is not saved but through being born of Water and Spirit (John 3:5). St. Paul tells us that “the Spirit brings life” (2 Cor 3:6).  Since it is the Holy Spirit who pours out charity in the hearts of the faithful (Gal 5:5), he is the source of all true life in God. Therefore in our creed we profess the Spirit is the “giver of life.”

Here’s a video from Jimmy Akin:


And one from thebomb.com (not really) Fr. Barron:



Done writing for now. Comment and start a discussion.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Nicene and Apostles

 
I'm going to be comparing the Apostles Creed with the Nicene Creed over the next month as well as some interesting facts and meditations. Enjoy.

Apostles: I believe in God, the Father Almighty, creator of Heaven and Earth.
Nicene: I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth, of all things visible and invisible.

The Apostles creed is as early as the close of the first century. It was created to be interogative as well as a profession of faith. The Nicene creed was created at the Council of Nicea in 325ad shortly after the Edict of Milan as signed into law by Constantine which legalized Christianity in the Empire.
Your medetation: why did the Nicene creed add "one" before God and "all things visibe and invisible"?